noorart_logo.jpg
Help

HomeAudioBooksToysVideoSoftware
Shop by CategorySchool SectionShop by AgeShop by ThemeShop by PriceShop by AuthorShop by PopularityWe RecommendCustomer CareMy account
Shop by Age > Adults > Books > 
  Search
    Advanced Search
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Category
bullet_icon_2008.gifSchool Section
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Age
bullet_icon_2008.gifBaby - 3 Years
bullet_icon_2008.gif4 - 8 Years
bullet_icon_2008.gif9 - 12 Years
bullet_icon_2008.gifTeen & Young Adults
bullet_icon_2008.gifAdults
bullet_icon_2008.gifIn the Shade of the Qur'an - Sayyid Qutb
bullet_icon_2008.gifSoftware & Electronics
bullet_icon_2008.gifAudio
bullet_icon_2008.gifVideo
bullet_icon_2008.gifToys
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Theme
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Price
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Author
bullet_icon_2008.gifShop by Popularity
bullet_icon_2008.gifWe Recommend
bullet_icon_2008.gifCustomer Care
   Join our mailing list

The Ethics of Disagreement in Islam 

TheEthicsofDisagreementinIslam-b.jpg

Our Price: $9.99

 
Description:
The Ethics of Disagreement may be perceived as an explanation of the etiquette envisioned by Islam for all those engaged in discourse and intellectual dialogue. To a great extent, the book is an exposition of the higher principles and purposes of the Shari'ah which provide Muslims with perspectives far vaster than those afforded by pedantic debate over points of law and procedure, or fine distinctions between conflicting theological arguments. In fact, experience has shown that long immer­sion in such futile debate often renders the mind incapable of compre­hending real situations and making value judgments on changing circumstances. Since the book was originally intended to address opposing Islamic political parties in one particular part of the Muslim world, the author went to great lengths to give examples from classical Muslim historical experience. In particular, he analyzes instances of judicial disagreement between the early fuqaha; differences that were not allowed to go beyond the academic or to cause hard feelings among the debaters and dissenters alike. Certainly, the differences between those early scholars never led them to lose sight of the higher purposes of the Shari`ah or their responsibilities. Although this book may more appropriately be titled The Ethics of Disagreement between the Classical Jurists, it nonetheless serves as a useful introduction to the subject of disagreement in general. It also lays down for contemporary Muslims many commendable examples of forbearance and understanding on the part of some of the greatest per­sonalities and scholars in Muslim history. In this lies the utility of this book. And it is the revival of this spirit that allows contemporary Muslims to look forward to the future with hope.